Topic summary
99%1 analyzed article/video554 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Interest Litigation results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 60.6% saturation with 1,007 hits. Analysis detected 4,451 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,662 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.2% and a BS Rank of 90% (1,467 of 14,646 topics). This Public Interest Litigation is worse (more manipulative) than 90.00% of the peer group.
Public Interest Litigation
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Public Interest Litigation attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Public Interest Litigation vs sitewide
Public Interest Litigation attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.