Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video4,447 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Health Risks results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 2,259 hits. Analysis detected 14,064 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,788 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (13,809 of 16,562 topics). This Public Health Risks is better (less manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group.
Public Health Risks
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Public Health Risks attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Public Health Risks vs sitewide
Public Health Risks attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.