Topic summary
64%1 analyzed article/video2,262 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Health Funding results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 927 hits. Analysis detected 5,633 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,786 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 24% (11,048 of 14,515 topics). This Public Health Funding is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
Public Health Funding
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Public Health Funding attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Public Health Funding vs sitewide
Public Health Funding attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.