Topic summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video955 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Psychological Thrillers results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 39.1% saturation with 1,492 hits. Analysis detected 4,792 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,820 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (4,118 of 22,149 topics). This Psychological Thrillers is worse (more manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group.
Psychological Thrillers
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,820
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510081.4% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 39.1%39.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.6%10.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.4%12.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 39.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Bandwagon: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Horn Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.0%Straw Man: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos