Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Prosecutorial Discretion results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 2.9% saturation with 260 hits. Analysis detected 369 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,990 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 23,967 topics). This Prosecutorial Discretion is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Prosecutorial Discretion
Topic details
Total words: 8,990
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 0.2%0.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos