Topic summary

⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,670 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Pro Natalism results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 1,573 hits. Analysis detected 9,479 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,654 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (13,331 of 16,558 topics). This Pro Natalism is better (less manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group.

Pro Natalism

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Uber	1%
⁠0%	Pittsburgh Pirates	1%
⁠0%	Opera	1%
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Privacy Policy	1%
⁠20%	Pro Natalism (selected)	2%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 11,654

Article count: 2

Authors

Anne Kim

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Pro Natalism attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Pro Natalism vs sitewide

Pro Natalism attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

The Heritage Foundation’s Troubling “Pro-Natalist” Agenda⁠^27%

Washington Monthly⁠^52%By Anne Kim⁠^48%7/1/2026, 9:00:00 AM

Women Aren’t “Under-babied.” They’re Under Threat.⁠^54%

Washington Monthly⁠^52%By Anne Kim⁠^48%6/28/2026, 9:00:00 AM