Topic summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video1,204 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pro Life Movement results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 279 hits. Analysis detected 2,335 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,816 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (19,067 of 24,545 topics). This Pro Life Movement is better (less manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group.
Pro Life Movement
Topic details
Total words: 4,816
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510022.3% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 5.8%5.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos