Topic summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video708 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Privacy Protection Act results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Hasty Generalization, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 374 hits. Analysis detected 2,235 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,832 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (7,349 of 21,634 topics). This Privacy Protection Act is worse (more manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group.
Privacy Protection Act
Topic details
Total words: 2,832
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510066.0% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.2%13.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.0%6.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos