Topic summary
23%1 analyzed article/video394 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Primaries results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 97 hits. Analysis detected 773 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,182 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 61% (5,799 of 14,868 topics). This Presidential Primaries is worse (more manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group.
Presidential Primaries
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Presidential Primaries attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Presidential Primaries vs sitewide
Presidential Primaries attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.