Topic summary

⁠100%1 analyzed article/video386 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Presidential Nominees results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32.6% saturation with 378 hits. Analysis detected 2,958 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,158 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (1,291 of 13,021 topics). This Presidential Nominees is worse (more manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group.

Presidential Nominees

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Oakland Culture	1%
⁠0%	Dive Bars	1%
⁠91%	Presidential Nominees (selected)	10%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 1,158

Article count: 1

Authors

Matthew Chapman

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Presidential Nominees attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Presidential Nominees vs sitewide

Presidential Nominees attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

'Dreadful copout': Susan Collins rebuked for 'shameful' defense of Trump nominee⁠^94%

Raw Story⁠^93%By Matthew Chapman⁠^88%7/17/2026, 12:43:44 AM