Topic summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos926 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Finances results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 1,106 hits. Analysis detected 6,410 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,392 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 42% (9,733 of 16,562 topics). This Presidential Finances is better (less manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group.
Presidential Finances
Topic details
Total words: 6,392
Article count: 3
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Presidential Finances attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Presidential Finances vs sitewide
Presidential Finances attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.