Topic summary
69%1 analyzed article/video514 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Debates results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 326 hits. Analysis detected 2,514 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,056 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (5,895 of 21,552 topics). This Presidential Debates is worse (more manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group.
Presidential Debates
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Presidential Debates attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Presidential Debates vs sitewide
Presidential Debates attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.