Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Presidential Claims results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 283 hits. Analysis detected 2,923 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,862 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 13,032 topics). This Presidential Claims is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Presidential Claims
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Presidential Claims attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Presidential Claims vs sitewide
Presidential Claims attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.