Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video465 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Campaign results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 131 hits. Analysis detected 1,183 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,860 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ā 44% (7,381 of 13,018 topics). This Presidential Campaign is better (less manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group.
Presidential Campaign
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Self-Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Self Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Oakland Culture1%
ā 0%Dive Bars1%
ā 44%Presidential Campaign (selected)3%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,860
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Presidential Campaign attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Presidential Campaign vs sitewide
Presidential Campaign attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos