Topic summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video478 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Aspirations results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 331 hits. Analysis detected 2,856 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,434 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (1,757 of 16,562 topics). This Presidential Aspirations is worse (more manipulative) than 89.40% of the peer group.
Presidential Aspirations
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠90%Presidential Aspirations (selected)9%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,434
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Presidential Aspirations attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Presidential Aspirations vs sitewide
Presidential Aspirations attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos