Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video965 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Appointments results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 579 hits. Analysis detected 4,347 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,860 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 58% (4,901 of 11,454 topics). This Presidential Appointments is worse (more manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.
Presidential Appointments
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Presidential Appointments attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Presidential Appointments vs All Other Publications
Presidential Appointments attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.