Topic summary
72%1 analyzed article/video1,466 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Portland Blazers results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Ad Hominem, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 35.1% saturation with 2,058 hits. Analysis detected 7,166 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,864 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 75% (5,667 of 22,261 topics). This Portland Blazers is worse (more manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group.
Portland Blazers
Topic details
Total words: 5,864
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510074.5% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 35.1%35.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 14.7%14.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 14.4%14.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.2%9.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 35.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Straw Man: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate