Topic summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video902 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Unity results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 470 hits. Analysis detected 3,051 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,608 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (7,846 of 24,661 topics). This Political Unity is worse (more manipulative) than 68.20% of the peer group.
Political Unity
Topic details
Total words: 3,608
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510068.2% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.8%2.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.0%13.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos