Topic summary

⁠5%2 analyzed articles/videos3,845 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Political Spending results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 1,147 hits. Analysis detected 6,615 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,733 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (12,787 of 13,025 topics). This Political Spending is better (less manipulative) than 98.20% of the peer group.

Political Spending

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Oakland Culture	1%
⁠0%	Dive Bars	1%
⁠2%	Political Spending (selected)	2%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 13,733

Article count: 2

Authors

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Political Spending attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Political Spending vs sitewide

Political Spending attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Spending in Chicago school board election exceeds $1.6 million as limits lift in race for board president⁠^15%

Chicago Sun-Times⁠^26%By Mila Koumpilova⁠^15% Chalkbeat⁠^16%7/17/2026, 12:14:29 AM

Who’s Spending in Your Congressional Election? We Tracked the Front Groups Fueling the 2026 Midterms.⁠^34%

The Intercept⁠^81%By Matt Sledge⁠^66%5/18/2026, 9:48:00 AM