Topic summary
96%1 analyzed article/video184 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Nominations results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 35.3% saturation with 260 hits. Analysis detected 1,590 faulty-reasoning hits from 736 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.4% and a BS Rank of 92% (1,459 of 16,937 topics). This Political Nominations is worse (more manipulative) than 91.40% of the peer group.
Political Nominations
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Political Nominations attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Political Nominations vs sitewide
Political Nominations attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.