Topic summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video2,115 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Maneuvering results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 1,444 hits. Analysis detected 6,706 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,460 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (9,692 of 21,649 topics). This Political Maneuvering is worse (more manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
Political Maneuvering
Topic details
Total words: 8,460
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510055.2% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.1%17.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 14.4%14.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos