Topic summary

⁠100%1 analyzed article/video387 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Political Hearings results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Ad Hominem, and Straw Man, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 72.2% saturation with 1,117 hits. Analysis detected 5,627 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,548 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (1,171 of 12,561 topics). This Political Hearings is worse (more manipulative) than 90.70% of the peer group.

Political Hearings

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Survival Stories	1%
⁠0%	Pizza Oven	1%
⁠91%	Political Hearings (selected)	11%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 1,548

Article count: 1

Authors

CA Post Editorial Board

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Political Hearings attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Political Hearings vs sitewide

Political Hearings attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

UCSF chancellor flubs biology –– but aces Evasion 101⁠^96%

California Post⁠^91%By CA Post Editorial Board⁠^100%7/16/2026, 12:36:37 AM