Topic summary
79%2 analyzed articles/videos1,070 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Debates results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 520 hits. Analysis detected 3,778 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,400 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (9,662 of 13,257 topics). This Political Debates is better (less manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group.
Political Debates
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Political Debates attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Political Debates vs sitewide
Political Debates attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.