Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Political Bellwether results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect and Negativity Bias, with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 4.3% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 67 faulty-reasoning hits from 562 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 22,533 topics). This Political Bellwether is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Political Bellwether
Topic details
Total words: 562
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles562 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.6%3.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Recency Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos