Topic summary
65%1 analyzed article/video860 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Policy Debates results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 754 hits. Analysis detected 2,175 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,440 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 37% (13,563 of 21,467 topics). This Policy Debates is better (less manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group.
Policy Debates
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Policy Debates attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Policy Debates vs sitewide
Policy Debates attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.