BS Summary: These Planetary Science results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 134 faulty-reasoning hits from 724 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 10,856 topics). This Planetary Science is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Planetary Science
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%War And Religion0%
⁠0%U S Bases0%
⁠0%Sugar Detox0%
⁠0%Social Exclusion0%
⁠0%Sfmta0%
⁠100%Book The Look59%
⁠100%Beauty Standards59%
⁠100%Washington State Budget60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Planetary Science (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 724
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Planetary Science attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Planetary Science vs All Other Publications
Planetary Science attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.