Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Plagiarism results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 714 hits . Analysis detected 4,180 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,405 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 24,718 topics). This Plagiarism is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Plagiarism
Topic details
Total words: 3,405
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 21.0% 21.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 17.7% 17.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 14.4% 14.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.3% 13.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.0%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst