Topic summary
⁠6%1 analyzed article/video901 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pine Barrens results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and In-Group Bias, with Bandwagon as the most egregious example at 2.9% saturation with 103 hits. Analysis detected 837 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,604 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (20,728 of 22,343 topics). This Pine Barrens is better (less manipulative) than 92.80% of the peer group.
Pine Barrens
Topic details
Total words: 3,604
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

7% percentile
02550751007.2% percentile
1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.9%1.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Bandwagon: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos