Topic summary
23%1 analyzed article/video1,135 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Philadelphia Zoo results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 195 hits. Analysis detected 1,014 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,405 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 49% (10,863 of 21,284 topics). This Philadelphia Zoo is better (less manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group.
Philadelphia Zoo
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Philadelphia Zoo attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Philadelphia Zoo vs sitewide
Philadelphia Zoo attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.