Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video500 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Gallagher results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 247 hits. Analysis detected 1,491 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,000 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 56% (7,392 of 16,562 topics). This Peter Gallagher is worse (more manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Peter Gallagher
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Peter Gallagher attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Peter Gallagher vs sitewide
Peter Gallagher attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.