Loading page

Topic: Pesticides

Pesticides has ^62% among topics. BS Score: 4.3%. Articles analyzed: 2. Words analyzed: 2,836.

Top reasoning patterns

Appeal to Emotion - 24.3% (688 hits)
Framing Effect - 19.5% (552 hits)
Appeal to Authority - 18.3% (520 hits)
Biased Writer Voice - 13.2% (375 hits)
Halo Effect - 11.9% (337 hits)
Confirmation Bias - 11.6% (328 hits)
Negativity Bias - 9.8% (278 hits)
Hasty Generalization - 9.5% (270 hits)

Analyzed articles

U.S. Supreme Court hears arguments in Roundup labeling case from St. Louis ^75.7%

STLPR - By Jason Rosenbaum - 4/27/2026, 7:46 PM

Circular Reasoning 19.3% - Anchoring Bias 13.3% - Straw Man 11.7%

The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments on Monday about whether a St. Louis-based jury was mistaken when awarding damages over how Roundup labels its product. It's a case that could have broad implications for whether people can sue over pesticides and herbicides. In 2023, a jury awarded St. Louis resident John Durrell $1.25 million... more

Read With KQED the Book That Changed How We See Nature ^82.2%

KQED - By Danielle Venton - 3/19/2026, 2:00 PM

“There was once a town in the heart of America where all life seemed to live in harmony with its surroundings.” In this, the opening line of Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring, the author begins to paint a bleak, but plausible, picture: a community where fish once thrived in the creeks and rivers, insects buzzed in fields, birds filled the... more

React failed to load. Check your network or content security policy, then refresh.

Topic: Pesticides

Top reasoning patterns

Analyzed articles

U.S. Supreme Court hears arguments in Roundup labeling case from St. Louis 75.7%

Read With KQED the Book That Changed How We See Nature 82.2%

U.S. Supreme Court hears arguments in Roundup labeling case from St. Louis ^75.7%

Read With KQED the Book That Changed How We See Nature ^82.2%