Topic summary
6%1 analyzed article/video1,352 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Personal Expenses Vs Campaign Expenses results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Negativity Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 600 hits. Analysis detected 2,128 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,408 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (14,320 of 16,809 topics). This Personal Expenses Vs Campaign Expenses is better (less manipulative) than 85.20% of the peer group.
Personal Expenses Vs Campaign Expenses
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Personal Expenses Vs Campaign Expenses attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Personal Expenses Vs Campaign Expenses vs sitewide
Personal Expenses Vs Campaign Expenses attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.