Topic summary
36% 1 analyzed article/video 401 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Personal-Celebrations-Life-Events results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 294 hits . Analysis detected 1,076 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,604 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 67% (8,116 of 24,407 topics). This Personal-Celebrations-Life-Events is worse (more manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group. Personal-Celebrations-Life-Events
Topic details
Total words: 1,604
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.7% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 18.3% 18.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.0% 13.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% No True Scotsman: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.6% Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst