Topic summary
⁠35%1 analyzed article/video1,603 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Penn Station Renaming results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 574 hits. Analysis detected 3,261 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,809 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,430 of 16,562 topics). This Penn Station Renaming is better (less manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group.
Penn Station Renaming
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠37%Penn Station Renaming (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 4,809
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Penn Station Renaming attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Penn Station Renaming vs sitewide
Penn Station Renaming attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos