Topic summary
⁠49%2 analyzed articles/videos1,944 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pediatric Health results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 802 hits. Analysis detected 4,042 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,280 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (15,389 of 21,675 topics). This Pediatric Health is better (less manipulative) than 71.00% of the peer group.
Pediatric Health
Topic details
Total words: 8,280
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

29% percentile
025507510029.0% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos