Topic summary
⁠34%1 analyzed article/video554 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pediatric Burn Care results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 181 hits. Analysis detected 1,243 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,216 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (7,508 of 23,032 topics). This Pediatric Burn Care is worse (more manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group.
Pediatric Burn Care
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,216
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510067.4% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.7%2.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos