Topic summary
28%1 analyzed article/video316 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oregon Department Of Forestry results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 134 hits. Analysis detected 567 faulty-reasoning hits from 948 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 73% (4,470 of 16,562 topics). This Oregon Department Of Forestry is worse (more manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group.
Oregon Department Of Forestry
Topic details
Total words: 948
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Oregon Department Of Forestry attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Oregon Department Of Forestry vs sitewide
Oregon Department Of Forestry attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos