Topic summary
38% 1 analyzed article/video 1,010 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Open Source Security results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 458 hits . Analysis detected 1,707 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,040 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 42% (14,303 of 24,545 topics). This Open Source Security is better (less manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group. Open Source Security
Topic details
Total words: 4,040
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.7% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% No True Scotsman: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst