Topic summary
38%1 analyzed article/video1,010 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Open Source Security results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 458 hits. Analysis detected 1,707 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,040 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 42% (14,303 of 24,545 topics). This Open Source Security is better (less manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group.
Open Source Security
Topic details
Total words: 4,040
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510041.7% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.3%11.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.8%1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%No True Scotsman: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos