Topic summary
29%1 analyzed article/video1,266 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Open Records Act results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Anecdotal, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 418 hits. Analysis detected 2,451 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,064 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (14,634 of 16,938 topics). This Open Records Act is better (less manipulative) than 86.40% of the peer group.
Open Records Act
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Open Records Act attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Open Records Act vs sitewide
Open Records Act attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.