Topic summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video1,327 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Office Space results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Self-Serving Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 495 hits. Analysis detected 3,500 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,308 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (16,990 of 24,545 topics). This Office Space is better (less manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group.
Office Space
Topic details
Total words: 5,308
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510030.8% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos