Topic summary
⁠12%1 analyzed article/video239 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oaks results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 156 hits. Analysis detected 255 faulty-reasoning hits from 956 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (4,657 of 22,295 topics). This Oaks is worse (more manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group.
Oaks
Topic details
Total words: 956
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510079.1% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles956 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 16.3%16.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.1%2.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 0.2%0.2%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos