Topic summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video608 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nostalgia In Sports results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Recency Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 313 hits. Analysis detected 3,200 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,432 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (5,578 of 22,261 topics). This Nostalgia In Sports is worse (more manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group.
Nostalgia In Sports
Topic details
Total words: 2,432
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510074.9% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 11.4%11.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 10.5%10.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.9%12.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.1%9.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.8%3.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 15.9%Recency Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Horn Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos