Topic summary
100%1 analyzed article/video244 analyzed words
BS Summary: These North African Relations results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 204 hits. Analysis detected 2,046 faulty-reasoning hits from 976 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of 90% (2,212 of 21,651 topics). This North African Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group.
North African Relations
Topic details
Total words: 976
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

90% percentile
025507510089.8% percentile
7.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles976 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.8%17.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 11.7%11.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 10.0%10.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.3%18.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.1%15.1%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 9.8%9.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 4.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 9.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 0.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.4%Halo Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos