Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,073 analyzed words
BS Summary: These No Vigilantes Act results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 846 hits. Analysis detected 5,203 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,219 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (8,028 of 13,018 topics). This No Vigilantes Act is better (less manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group.
No Vigilantes Act
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Oakland Culture1%
⁠0%Dive Bars1%
⁠39%No Vigilantes Act (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 6,219
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
No Vigilantes Act attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
No Vigilantes Act vs sitewide
No Vigilantes Act attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos