Topic summary
⁠34%1 analyzed article/video447 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nhl Expansion To Texas results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 334 hits. Analysis detected 1,353 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,788 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (5,136 of 22,481 topics). This Nhl Expansion To Texas is worse (more manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group.
Nhl Expansion To Texas
Topic details
Total words: 1,788
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510077.2% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.6%15.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.5%3.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos