Topic summary
⁠3%1 analyzed article/video197 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York City Fc results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Anchoring Bias, and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 86 faulty-reasoning hits from 788 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (9,775 of 21,884 topics). This New York City Fc is worse (more manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group.
New York City Fc
Topic details
Total words: 788
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510055.3% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles788 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos