Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video2,653 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York City Council results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, In-Group Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 700 hits. Analysis detected 6,141 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,612 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (12,037 of 13,019 topics). This New York City Council is better (less manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group.
New York City Council
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
New York City Council attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
New York City Council vs sitewide
New York City Council attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.