Topic summary
⁠2%1 analyzed article/video208 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nevada Law results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 4.2% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 74 faulty-reasoning hits from 832 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (19,177 of 23,560 topics). This Nevada Law is better (less manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group.
Nevada Law
Topic details
Total words: 832
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510018.6% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles832 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 4.2%4.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos