Topic summary
ā 67%1 analyzed article/video462 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nebraska Senate Race results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 390 hits. Analysis detected 1,729 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,848 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ā 72% (6,040 of 21,285 topics). This Nebraska Senate Race is worse (more manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group.
Nebraska Senate Race
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Nebraska Senate Race attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Nebraska Senate Race vs sitewide
Nebraska Senate Race attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.