Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,400 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Neanderthals results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 3.6% saturation with 204 hits. Analysis detected 2,231 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,600 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (16,272 of 16,564 topics). This Neanderthals is better (less manipulative) than 98.20% of the peer group.

Neanderthals

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Uber	1%
⁠0%	Pittsburgh Pirates	1%
⁠0%	Opera	1%
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Privacy Policy	1%
⁠2%	Neanderthals (selected)	2%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 5,600

Article count: 1

Authors

Anna Goldfield

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Neanderthals attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Neanderthals vs sitewide

Neanderthals attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Could we ever clone Neanderthals?⁠^10%

Popular Science⁠^15%By Anna Goldfield⁠^0%7/7/2026, 1:01:00 PM